翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Choy So-yuk
・ Choy sum
・ Choy Weng Yang
・ Choy Yee Bridge Stop
・ Choy Yiu Chung
・ Chow On Lam
・ Chow ring
・ Chow Sang Sang
・ Chow Tai Fook Enterprises
・ Chow test
・ Chow Tsz Ki
・ Chow Yam-nam
・ Chow Yei-ching
・ Chow Yun-fat
・ Chow Yun-fat filmography
Chow's lemma
・ Chow's moving lemma
・ Chow's theorem
・ Chow-chow (food)
・ CHOW-FM
・ Chow-its-hoot
・ Chowa Dara
・ Chowa, Tibet
・ Chowalan
・ Chowan
・ Chowan County Courthouse
・ Chowan County, North Carolina
・ Chowan Hospital
・ Chowan River
・ Chowan River Formation


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Chow's lemma : ウィキペディア英語版
Chow's lemma

Chow's lemma, named after Wei-Liang Chow, is one of the foundational results in algebraic geometry.
It roughly says that a proper morphism is fairly close to being a projective morphism. More precisely, a version of it states the following:
:If X is a scheme that is proper over a noetherian base S, then there exists a projective S-scheme X' and a surjective S-morphism f\colon X' \to X that induces an isomorphism f^(U) \simeq U for some dense open U\subseteq X.
== Proof ==
The proof here is a standard one (cf. ).
It is easy to reduce to the case when X is irreducible, as follows. X is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Then it's also topologically noetherian, and consists of a finite number of irreducible components X_i , which are each proper over S (because they're closed immersions in the scheme X which is proper over S). If, within each of these irreducible components, there exists a dense open U_i \subset X_i, then we can take U := \bigsqcup (U_i \setminus \bigcup \limits_ X_j). It is not hard to see that each of the disjoint pieces are dense in their respective X_i, so the full set U is dense in X. In addition, it's clear that we can similarly find a morphism g which satisfies the density condition.
Having reduced the problem, we now assume X is irreducible. We recall that it must also be noetherian. Thus, we can find a finite open affine cover X = \bigcup_^n U_i. U_i are quasi-projective over S; there are open immersions over S, \phi_i \colon U_i \to P_i into some projective S-schemes P_i. Put U = \cap U_i. U is nonempty since X is irreducible. Let
:\phi\colon U \to P = P_1 \times_S \cdots \times_S P_n.
be given by \phi_i's restricted to U over S.
Let
:\psi\colon U \to X \times_S P.
be given by U \hookrightarrow X and \phi over S. \psi is then an immersion; thus, it factors as an open immersion followed by a closed immersion X' \to X \times_S P. Let f\colon X' \to X be the immersion followed by the projection. We claim f induces f^(U) \simeq U; for that, it is enough to show f^(U) = \psi(U). But this means that \psi(U) is closed in U \times_S P. \psi factorizes as U \overset\to U \times_S P \to X \times_S P. P is separated over S and so the graph morphism \Gamma_\phi is a closed immersion. This proves our contention.
It remains to show X' is projective over S. Let g\colon X' \to P be the closed immersion followed by the projection. Showing that g is a closed immersion shows X' is projective over S. This can be checked locally. Identifying U_i with its image in P_i we suppress \phi_i from our notation.
Let V_i = p_i^(U_i) where p_i \colon P \to P_i. We claim g^(V_i) are an open cover of X'. This would follow from f^(U_i) \subset g^(V_i) as sets. This in turn follows from f = p_i \circ g on U_i as functions on the underlying topological space. Since X is separated over S and U_i is dense, this is clear from looking at the relevant commutative diagram. Now, X \times_S P \to P is closed since it is a base extension of the proper morphism X \to S. Thus, g(X') is a closed subscheme covered by V_i, and so it is enough to show that for each i the map g\colon g^(V_i) \to V_i, denoted by h, is a closed immersion.
Fix i. Let Z be the graph of u\colon V_i \overset\to U_i \hookrightarrow X. It is a closed subscheme of X \times_S V_i since X is separated over S. Let q_1 \colon X \times_S P \to X,\ q_2 \colon X \times_S P \to P be the projections. We claim that h factors through Z, which would imply h is a closed immersion. But for w\colon U' \to V_i we have:
:v = \Gamma_u \circ w \quad\Leftrightarrow\quad q_1 \circ v = u \circ q_2 \circ v \quad\Leftrightarrow\quad q_1 \circ \psi = u \circ q_2 \circ \psi \quad\Leftrightarrow\quad q_1 \circ \psi = u \circ \phi.
The last equality holds and thus there is w that satisfies the first equality. This proves our claim. \square

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Chow's lemma」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.